Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 23:59
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
You sound like ChatGPT - The Verge
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
The S&P 500 closes at 6,000 as bulls aim for return to record territory - MarketWatch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Saepe ut vero explicabo illo hic aspernatur.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Scientists Unveil a Method to Give Every Human the Ability to See in the Dark - The Daily Galaxy
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
What's your review of the movie Poor Things?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Stranded dolphins on Oahu test positive for human-risk bacteria - KITV
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.